Why should school leaders develop emotional intelligence?

Advertisment

spot_img

This article is the sixth in a ten-part series that examines some of the key concepts that leaders of private language schools might find it useful to be familiar with.

Introduction

Emotional intelligence is increasingly recognised as being fundamental to leaders’ competencies and to how well they perform. In fact, research indicates that there exist statistically significant differences between effective and ineffective leaders in terms of their level of emotional intelligence, with the former scoring much higher than the latter (Kotzé & Venter, 2011). For example, the emotional intelligence of effective leaders is seen as a predictor of employees’ organisational citizenship behaviour (Dartey-Baah & Mekpor, 2017), and is associated with employee engagement (Smith, 2017). This article first considers some of the key merits of emotional intelligence for leaders of private language schools and then examines how it can be developed.

Acknowledging vulnerability

Emotional intelligence enables school leaders to acknowledge their vulnerability and cultivate more meaningful connections with their followers. Being vulnerable might be difficult for a leader but it deepens one’s capacity for interdependency, allows one to encourage leadership from below and recognises that others within the organisation may be right (Shapiro, 2016).

When school leaders share their vulnerability with employees, this acts as a significant mechanism for the development of relationships and the enhancement of charisma; this is due to the fact that employees are able to connect with them on an emotional level (Ito & Bligh, 2017). In fact, vulnerability is considered to be a powerful means by which leaders can foster social connections in the workplace (Brecher, 2017). Some of the ways in which leaders can exhibit vulnerability traits in their practices is by: asking for and accepting advice and help; admitting when uncertain about something; accepting mistakes from others; and acknowledging and being accountable for their own mistakes (Brecher, 2017).

Integrating vulnerability and professional identity is an important means by which to achieve authenticity and strength (Kern, 2014), these two factors being particularly important for school leaders. Vulnerability is fundamental for authentic leadership and it acts as a significant factor in the cultivation of innovation, creativity and change (Wright, 2015). Authentic leadership requires the confidence to: accept vulnerabilities; learn to make decisions without all the necessary information; and risk failure as a means of fostering creativity and innovation (Clare, 2018). The humility associated with leaders who demonstrate their vulnerability encourages employees to be more proactive (Chen et al., 2018) and to have more trust in them, the latter factor being key to fostering an innovative work culture (Lei et al., 2019).

Regulating emotions and behaviour

One of the chief values of emotional intelligence is its capacity to enable individuals to better regulate their emotions and reduce aggressive behaviour. The latter is particularly pertinent for leaders in private language schools given the demands of the job and the competitiveness of the sector. While aggressive behaviour might be valued by some leaders as a means of achieving one’s goals, research indicates that there exist negative outcomes associated with such behaviour. For example, the kind of leaders who typically exhibit aggressive tendencies tend to be narcissistic and their behaviour can be seen as abusive by employees, affecting mostly those who have low self-esteem or a low core self-evaluation (Nevicka et al., 2018). These employees end up being less productive and are much more likely to experience burnout when working for such leaders (Nevicka et al., 2018).

Moreover, an autocratic leadership style is a predictor of passive aggressive behaviours (Johnson & Klee, 2007). In a diverse workplace, one of the reasons why leaders might adopt such behaviours as a coping mechanism is that they have diversity intelligence deficiencies which hinder them from protecting employees and harnessing their potential to attain organisational objectives (Hughes & Brown, 2018). This leads employees to experience a toxic and hostile work environment that might eventually lead to high attrition, low productivity and a range of negative emotions (Hughes & Brown, 2018).

While aggressive behaviour on the part of leaders might be masked as humour, aggressive humour is negatively related to leader-member exchange, and the relationship between the two phenomena lacks the mediation of employees’ identification with the leader (Pundt & Herrmann, 2015). This implies that leaders should avoid aggressive humour and should seek to improve their relationship with followers by using affiliative humour (Pundt & Herrmann, 2015). Furthermore, aggressive humour is negatively associated with employee creativity (Lee, 2015).

Engaging employees

Leadership and employee engagement are connected because school leaders who wish to create engaging work climates need to develop their emotional intelligence, especially their capacity for self-awareness (Shuck & Herd, 2012). The latter is the basis for the other three dimensions of emotional intelligence, i.e. self-management, social awareness and relationship management. Harter et al.’s (2002) model indicates that leaders manage to engage their employees when they: respond to their basic needs; communicate role-related expectations; provide developmental feedback; and explain how employees fit in the organisation. This is somewhat related to Herzberg’s (1968) motivational theory, given that it underscores the significance of providing employees with clear expectations and good working conditions as the foundation for engagement. However, in order for the latter to be boosted, school leaders also need to give attention to such authentic employee motivators as achievement, recognition, responsibility and personal growth (Herzberg, 1968).

Developing emotional intelligence

Despite recognising the value of emotional intelligence, some school leaders might not be fully aware of their emotional intelligence competencies or else only possess a conceptual understanding of what these consist of (Roseberry, 2018). Hence, it is vital that leaders are provided with the means to develop their awareness further. Raising leaders’ awareness of their emotional intelligence through self-assessment tools can play an important role in leadership development (Czabanowska et al., 2014). However, most often leaders require feedback on their reflective process so as to fully understand their emotional intelligence competencies (Boyatzis et al., 2013). 360-degree survey feedback is particularly helpful, since it can establish whether there is alignment between a leader’s self-assessment and the ratings provided by colleagues and other people within an organisation (Gregory et al., 2017).

Feedback can be followed up by coaching sessions that enable individuals to further develop their ability to engage in emotionally intelligent leadership (Boyatzis et al., 2013). School leaders can enhance their emotional intelligence by means of a range of strategies. These include: keeping a journal that records their emotions; engaging in meditation; deploying positive visualisation; conducting appreciative inquiry; thinking before acting; and listening empathetically (Scott, 2013). Self-awareness, self-management, social management and relationship management are four skills that can also bolster a leader’s emotional intelligence (Scott, 2013).

Conclusion

School leaders’ ability to develop their emotional intelligence will have an impact not only on their behaviour but also on the wellbeing of their staff. Despite the fact that private language schools operate in market conditions that are at times of a cut-throat nature, leaders must always remember that the way they interact with their staff, and the manner in which they handle interpersonal communication, can either serve to enhance satisfaction and performance or else severely dampen it. When leaders develop the necessary awareness that enables them to harness the power of their emotional intelligence, it is the entire school community that benefits.

References

Boyatzis, R.E., Smith, M.L., Van Oosten, E. & Woolford, L. (2013.) ‘Developing resonant leaders through emotional intelligence, vision and coaching’. Organizational Dynamics 42 1:17–24.
Brecher, N.D. (2017). ‘Are leadership and vulnerability at odds?’ Journal of Property Management 82 1:23.
Chen, Y., Liu, B., Zhang, L. & Qian, S. (2018). ‘Can leader “humility” spark employee “proactivity”? The mediating role of psychological empowerment’. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 39 3:326–339.
Clare, H. (2018) ‘Vision and vulnerability: thoughts on leadership and conservation’. Studies in Conservation 63 1:64–69.
Czabanowska, K., Malho, A., Schroder-Baeck, P., Popa, D. & Burazeri, G. (2014). ‘Do we develop public health leaders? association between public health competencies and emotional intelligence: a cross-sectional study’. BMC Medical Education 14 83:1–7.
Dartey-Baah, K. & Mekpor, B. (2017). ‘The leaders’ emotional intelligence: an antecedent of employees’ voluntary workplace behaviour’. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies 8 3:352–365.
Gregory, P.J., Robbins, B., Schwaitzberg, S.D. & Harmon, L. (2017). ‘Leadership development in a professional medical society using 360-degree survey feedback to assess emotional intelligence’. Surgical Endoscopy 31 9:3565–3573.
Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L. & Hayes, T.L. (2002). ‘Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis’. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 268–279.
Herzberg, F. (1968). ‘One more time: how do you motivate employees?’ Harvard Business Review 46 1:53–62.
Hughes, C. & Brown, L.M. (2018). ‘Exploring leaders’ discriminatory, passive-aggressive behavior toward protected class employees using diversity intelligence’. Advances in Developing Human Resources 20 3:263–284.
Ito, A. & Bligh, M.C. (2017). ‘Feeling vulnerable? disclosure of vulnerability in the charismatic leadership relationship’. Journal of Leadership Studies 10 3: 66–70.
Johnson, N.J. & Klee, T. (2007) ‘Passive-aggressive behavior and leadership styles in organizations’. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 14 2:130–142.
Kern, E.O. (2014). ‘The pathologized counselor: effectively integrating vulnerability and professional identity’. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health 9 2:304–316.
Kotzé, M. & Venter, I. (2011) ‘Differences in emotional intelligence between effective and ineffective leaders in the public sector: an empirical study’. International Review of Administrative Sciences 77 2:397–427.
Lee, D.R. (2015). ‘The impact of leader’s humor on employees’ creativity: the moderating role of trust in leader’. Seoul Journal of Business 21 1:59–86.
Lei, H., Phouvong, S. & Le, P.B. (2019). ‘How to foster innovative culture and capable champions for Chinese firms: an empirical research’. Chinese Management Studies 13 1:51–69.
Nevicka, B., De Hoogh, A., Den Hartog, D.N. & Belschak, F.D. (2018). ‘Narcissistic leaders and their victims: followers low on self-esteem and low on core self-evaluations suffer most’. Frontiers in Psychology 9 1–14.
Pundt, A. & Herrmann, F. (2015). ‘Affiliative and aggressive humour in leadership and their relationship to leader–member exchange’. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 88 1:108–125.
Roseberry, W. (2018). Military Leaders’ Perceived Importance of Emotional Intelligence (EI) Characteristics When Leading Organizational Change. EdD in Organizational Leadership Thesis. Brandman University. Available from https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/2043404240.html?FMT=ABS
Scott, J. (2013). ‘How healthcare leaders can increase emotional intelligence’. Radiology Management 11–16.
Shapiro, E.R. (2016). ‘Speaking out: learning from the director’s role: leadership and vulnerability’. Organisational and Social Dynamics 16 2:255–270.
Shuck, B. & Herd, A.M. (2012). ‘Employee engagement and leadership: exploring the convergence of two frameworks and implications for leadership development in HRD’. Human Resource Development Review 11 2:156–181.
Smith, S.S. (2017). Discovering Relationships Between Social Competencies of Emotional Intelligence and Employee Engagement Within a Population of Business Leaders. PhD Thesis. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology. Available from https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1929534037.html?FMT=ABS (Last accessed 4 November 2024).
Wright, R. (2015). ‘It’s messy being authentic: lessons learned on the road to becoming an authentic leader’. Strategic HR Review 14 3:79–84.

MET 34-1 p50-52 JanFeb 2025

More articles

spot_img

Recent articles

Daniel Xerri
Daniel Xerrihttp://www.danielxerri.com
Dr Daniel Xerri is a senior lecturer in applied linguistics and TESOL at the University of Malta. He chairs the ELT Council and holds an MBA from the University of Essex. www.danielxerri.com