Collaborative conversations

Imagine being in a classroom full of teenagers who are learning your academic content and, at the same time, building both basic and academic conversation skills. Some of your learners are born English speakers, some have been learning English for several years, and others are newcomers. This creates a group of students who demonstrate a wide range of language proficiencies – both in basic interpersonal communication skills (BICS) and in cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP) (Cummins, 2008).

How, then, do you become a facilitator who helps students strengthen their speaking skills while ensuring they engage deeply with academic content? In this article, I will explore some strategies and considerations for using collaborative conversations in the classroom to support the development of academic speaking.

What is a collaborative conversation?

A collaborative conversation, or collaborative discussion, is a structured speaking opportunity where at least two students engage in dialogue to achieve a common academic task. These tasks may include: using content vocabulary; summarising a lesson; making claims with evidence; asking and answering questions; or expressing opinions.

The primary goal is to give students repeated opportunities to build confidence in expressing their ideas in both social and academic settings. Collaborative conversations also enhance listening skills, as students practise accurately receiving, understanding and interpreting spoken information from their peers. Over time, these discussions foster a culture of shared learning, where students recognise that knowledge grows through interaction rather than silent absorption.

Think of collaborative conversations as bridges: they connect everyday communication skills (such as chatting with a friend in the cafeteria) with the more formal, structured discourse needed to succeed in classrooms, colleges and careers.

Why do collaborative conversations matter?

Students learn language by using it in purposeful, meaningful contexts. While reading, writing and listening are essential, speaking remains the most immediate way for learners to process, rehearse and refine academic content. When students talk through an idea with peers, they clarify their own thinking, uncover misconceptions and practise new vocabulary in a low-stakes environment.

For multilingual learners, collaborative conversations are especially powerful because they provide authentic practice with academic discourse in a supportive setting. But even L1 English speakers benefit from conversing with students who may be reluctant writers, often finding it easier to ‘test out’ ideas orally before committing them to paper.

In a personal account, a ninth-grade history teacher once shared with me that her quietest students blossomed during structured partner talks. By the time the whole-class discussion began, those same students – who had once avoided speaking – felt prepared to contribute because they had rehearsed their thinking first. That is the transformative power of collaborative conversations.

Learning through conversation techniques

Collaborative conversation is an effective complement to the development of reading, writing, speaking and listening skills. While familiar strategies such as role play, interviews, debates and storytelling are valuable, collaborative conversation offers a simple way to integrate interaction multiple times throughout a lesson. Regular opportunities to talk with peers in a supportive environment help students gain communication skills and confidence. Below are practical collaborative conversation techniques you can apply immediately in your classroom, along with examples across subject areas.

1 Turn and talk

This is the quickest way to spark discussion at any point in a lesson. Students turn to a partner and respond to a prompt you provide verbally or display on the board. Setting a timer ensures that each partner has one to two minutes to share ideas, see these examples of Turn and talk in action.

  • Warm-up in science: ‘Turn to your partner and explain what you already know about the water cycle.’
  • Literature review: After reading a chapter, students answer: ‘What do you think motivated the character’s decision?’
  • Exit ticket: ‘What is one new thing you learnt today, and one question you still have?’

The goal is simple: every student has at least one chance to speak during the lesson, which is especially important for those not yet ready to share in front of the whole class. Over time, these quick talks create a habit of participation and reflection.

2 Think-pair-share

In this technique, students first reflect independently on an open-ended question, writing down their thoughts. Next, they share ideas with a partner before reporting to a larger group. Writing beforehand helps students organise their thoughts, while the partner stage allows them to practise expressing their ideas before sharing publicly. Targeted skills include active listening, building on others’ ideas, clarifying and agreeing or disagreeing respectfully. Examples of Think-pair-share applications:

  • history: After analysing a primary source, students reflect on: ‘What perspective does this document reveal about the event?’
  • maths: ‘How would you explain the steps to solving this equation to a friend?’
  • English language arts: ‘Which theme from the story resonates most with you, and why?’
  • science: ‘What happened in the experiment? Why do you think it happened?’
  • civics / social studies: ‘How could this news story change life in our city?’

A variation of this technique is Think-listening-pair-share. Instead of reporting their own views, students share their partner’s viewpoint during the partner or whole-group stages. This process builds listening comprehension and encourages notetaking.

3 Gallery walks

In a gallery walk, pairs or small groups move around the room to discuss prompts or tasks displayed at different stations. Stations may include a poem, map, graph or maths problem, or they simply feature open-ended prompts such as:
‘Peace is . . .’ or ‘Poverty means . . .’.

There are many benefits of a gallery walk. Students are physically active as they move around the room, which helps boost energy, focus and engagement. The conversations become more dynamic because learners encounter new ideas and diverse perspectives at each station. In addition, the activity naturally integrates writing, since groups often jot down their thoughts, record responses or build on peers’ ideas before rotating to the next station. This process encourages collaboration, critical thinking and a deeper understanding of the content.

Here are a few examples of how to apply this discussion technique in different content areas:

  • social studies: Students rotate around stations featuring political cartoons from different eras, discussing what message the artist was trying to convey.
  • visual arts: Using different visual arts, each station has a guiding question posted next to the image, such as: ‘What do you notice in the painting?’ ‘What emotions do you see in the faces or colours?’
    ‘What message do you think the artist wanted to share?’

You can also digitise your gallery walk using laptops or tablets. You might use QR codes (qrcodecreator.com) to access online materials or tools like recording apps (vocaroo.com) to let students record oral responses. This is especially effective in blended or remote learning environments.

4 Jigsaw

The jigsaw strategy gives each student responsibility for becoming an ‘expert’ on a subtopic before teaching their peers. Here are a few examples:

  • world history: Students study Mesopotamia. One becomes the geography expert, another focuses on trade, another on society and another on contributions. Together, they piece the civilisation back together like a puzzle.
  • science: Groups research different types of pollution (air, water, land, noise, light) and then teach one another about impacts and solutions.
  • English language arts: While reading a novel, students divide according to roles: character analysis, setting, plot and theme.

This strategy supports both BICS and CALP. During group preparation, students rely on informal, conversational language – asking questions like ‘What do you think this means?’ or suggesting ideas to teammates. Later, as they share their findings with the class, they shift to more formal, content-specific language – using terms such as ‘ecosystem’ in science or ‘checks and balances’ in social studies. This transition gives students meaningful practice moving between everyday communication and the academic language needed for success in school.

Tips for effective collaborative conversations

Set clear expectations. When using any discussion technique, provide specific guidelines such as how to transition smoothly (for a gallery walk). You also need to communicate to your students which speaking skills they need to demonstrate (building on ideas; using content vocabulary) during the activity. Finally, remind students about the acceptable behaviours before, during and after discussions (responding in complete sentences; making eye contact; listening attentively). Another tip: post sentence starters on the board or distribute conversation cards that remind students how to agree, disagree or build on an idea.

Honour students’ language acquisition stages. Students progress through stages of English acquisition. Some are confident speakers, while others may be in the pre-production or ‘silent period’. Forcing students to speak too soon can cause stress and hinder learning. Respect their stage and allow gradual participation.

Practical example: A newcomer might draw or point instead of speaking at first. Later, they may use single words (rain; flood) in response to a partner’s question. Eventually, with modelling and support, they progress to full sentences and academic language.

Foster a welcoming speaking space. Encourage students to use their first language (L1), cognates and code-switching during discussions. For instance, Spanish speakers might use gobierno in a social studies discussion before moving to government. Allowing L1 use reduces cognitive load and promotes participation by giving students a familiar entry point into complex academic conversations. This strategy also validates students’ linguistic identities and shows that their home languages are valuable resources for learning. Over time, scaffolding from L1 to English builds confidence, expands vocabulary and helps multilingual learners bridge prior knowledge with new academic concepts.

Provide language support. If you want students to speak in a claim-evidence-reasoning structure after reading a story using think-pair-share, you can ask them to use these starters when speaking:

  • claim: The theme of the story is . . .
  • evidence: In Chapter 1, the main character said . . .
  • reasoning: That statement shows . . .

Other useful starters include: I agree / disagree because . . .; At first, I thought . . . but then . . .; Another perspective is . . .

In addition to using starters, you can also provide students with a vocabulary list or anchor charts to support them in integrating academic terms into their discussions. These tools give students both the structure and the language patterns needed to engage in academic conversations using content-specific vocabulary.

Conclusion

Collaborative conversation techniques create meaningful opportunities for students to practise academic speaking while reinforcing listening, reading and writing skills. These strategies promote critical thinking, respectful exchange of ideas and confident use of academic language. Successful implementation requires clear goals and procedures, respect for students’ language development stages and a safe environment that encourages risk-taking and mistakes as part of learning. When these conditions are in place, collaborative conversations become a powerful tool for building both language and content knowledge. More importantly, they equip students with the lifelong skills of dialogue, empathy and critical thinking – skills that extend well beyond the classroom walls.

Reference

Cummins, J., (2008). ‘BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction’. In Street, B.V. & Hornberger, N. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Language and Education 2 71-83.

More articles

Recent articles

Grand Pacheco
Grand Pacheco
Grand is a National Board Certified Teacher and a 2025 Global Learning Fellow, awarded by the National Education Foundation. He currently teaches high school multilingual learners and students with exceptional needs in Maryland, USA. With experience as a mentor teacher, department chair, consultant, writer and professional development provider, his expertise spans special education, social studies and teaching English to multilingual learners and students with exceptional needs. He holds a Doctorate in Educational Leadership from George Washington University.